Reform
of Parish Poll and other Direct Democracy Regulations
March 2009, memo re.
need for reform of Parish Poll and other DD rules
Future local referenda and polls would have more weight if the rules
for
their admissibility and conduct were to be improved -- at present by
international standards they are bad. The law governing Parish Polls is
laid down in the Local Government Act of 1972 and in one or more later
decrees coming from Whitehall. An indication of what is in the 1972 Act
may be found here http://www.iniref.org/local-referendum.html
Improvements to the laws and rules should include the following:
- A decision of the electorate should be legally binding
on the relevant
council or government, e.g. parish, town, city, county. (At present the
citizen-led poll is advisory and available only at parish
level).
- A poll should usually address matters in the area of
responsibility of
the parish or other council. However, appeals to higher levels of
government
could also be made via local poll.
- Polling arrangements. These should be at least as
"voter-friendly" as
the arrangements for local elections. Every elector should be told in
advance about the poll and its topic. Postal voting should be enabled,
opening hours for polling stations should be reasonable.
- Triggering a poll should be done as recommended by
democracy experts.
This means that a substantial number of electors, not just a handful,
should be required in order to demand a referendum. This would give
more democratic "clout" to the whole procedure. A sliding scale,
currently used in The Netherlands, offers a guide to proportion of
"signatures" needed, depending on size of the political unit (village,
town, city etc.).
For example, in a hamlet with 100 voters, say one in ten proposers
would be needed, for a town with 10 thousand inhabitants, one in a
hundred should suffice.
- Our democratic rights to citizen-initiated binding
referendum should be
extended to all levels of government.
-------------------------------------
Earlier note
A loophole, really an error, in local government law allows a very
small
number of citizens of a parish to force a district council to hold a
referendum. Clearly, our right to protest against government policy is
important and the initiative shown by the activists (in this case) is
praiseworthy.
However, the democratic instrument ("parish poll") regulated in the Act
of 1972 is defective and the regulations should be revised, preferably
as part of a reform which entrenches our democratic rights of
citizen-initiated referendum at all levels of governance.
For instance, only a substantial number of electors, not a handful,
should be needed in order to trigger a referendum. A sliding scale,
currently used in The Netherlands, offers a guide to proportion of
"signatures" needed, depending on size of the political unit (village,
town, city etc.).
More detail about "citizens' democracy" is at
I&R ~ GB Citizens' Initiative and Referendum
http://www.iniref.org/
PAGE LOCATION
http://www.iniref.org/poll-regulations.html