Quality of democracy and referendum wrangling (short
title)
www.iniref.org
Quality of democracy regarding a ballot on the
negotiated UK/EU "deal"
The Guardian wrote 6 May 2019
"May is opposed to offering a second referendum but
parliament could decide to back one if the talks collapse
and the government proceeds with a plan for binding votes
on what MPs would prefer as an outcome. In that scenario,
there could be a binary referendum on May’s Brexit deal or
some kind of three-way poll on Brexit
with the options of a deal, no deal or remaining in the
EU."
INIREF comments:
"Some kind of three-way poll" would be a reckless
experiment with a very important public decision. A
multi-choice, preference or ranking procedure has never
been used in a UK referendum and could confuse many
voters. Referendum experts recommend that only two clear
alternatives should be presented to voters. Also, the
option "leave EU with no deal" has been overwhelmingly
rejected by our MPs so if MPs, in agreeing to propositions
or questions for a referendum (which they must before such
a ballot can be held) accept "no deal" as an option then
the House would appear at best insincere, at worst
dilettantish and dishonest. So if a withdrawal agreement
has been accepted by government, Parliament and the EU, it
should be put before the electorate for confirmation or
rejection, against the option of keeping the EU deal which
we have.
---------------------------------------------------
Campaign for direct democracy in Britain & NI
Citizens' Initiative and Referendum I&R ~ GB
http://www.iniref.org/enter.html
Site Index
http://www.iniref.org/
Blog: quality of democracy in the "brexit" saga. And Other
related matters!
Contact: info@iniref.org